Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

v3.23.3
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
NOTE I - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
USDA Grant
 
In May 2023, the Company was awarded a five-year, $30.0 million grant by U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (“NRCS”) to build markets for climate-smart commodities and invest in America’s climate-smart producers. The objectives of the project are to support the production and marketing of climate-smart commodities by providing voluntary incentives to producers and landowners to implement climate-smart agricultural production practices, activities, and systems on working lands; measure/quantify, monitor and verify the carbon and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) benefits associated with those practices; and develop markets and promote the resulting climate-smart commodities (i.e. camelina and camelina seeds). The goal of the project is to improve agronomic practices and drive the adoption of carbon-smart practices that will ultimately lower GHG emissions and carbon intensity of camelina production as well as increase carbon sequestration in the soil with a benefit to the crops in rotation with camelina.
 
Total reimbursements from the USDA grant (including amounts due to be received) were $3.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, and are reported net of general and administrative expenses and facilities expenses, respectively in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company has $0.8 million of receivables due from the USDA grant program, which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2023.
 
The Company has quarterly reporting requirements that include performance and progress reporting, in addition to being subject to an annual audit for costs reimbursed under the USDA grant. The Company is the primary contractor for the grant award and includes subcontractors and sub-awardees.
 
Engineering, Procurement and Construction Contract
 
On May 18, 2021, our BKRF subsidiary and CTCI entered into an Engineering, Procurement and Construction Agreement with CTCI (the “CTCI EPC Agreement”) pursuant to which the firm agreed to produce services for the engineering, procurement, construction, ("EPC") start-up and testing of the Bakersfield Renewable Fuels Refinery. On January 10, 2023, BKRF entered into Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) to the CTCI EPC Agreement. Pursuant to the Amendment, BKRF and CTCI agreed to, among other things:
 

(i)
a new guaranteed maximum price of $
275
million subject to upward adjustment pending final settlement of certain change orders pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Amendment (the “New GMP”);
(ii)
a change to the payment dates for costs and fees that are payable to CTCI under the CTCI EPC Agreement, which will now be payable after substantial completion of our Bakersfield Renewable Fuels Refinery in 18 monthly installments; and
(iii)
provide for liquidated damages commencing on a new substantial completion date of March 31, 2023, which may only be adjusted in accordance with the CTCI EPC Agreement. In connection with the Amendment, the Company agreed to provide a payment guarantee in favor of CTCI for amounts that may be owed by BKRF under the CTCI EPC Agreement, pursuant to an owner parent guarantee, dated as of January 10, 2023, by and between the Company and CTCI.
 
Deferred amounts under the Amendment are scheduled for payment equally over eighteen months after substantial completion, except that accrued interest through the first payment shall be due with the first principal payment and then accrued interest shall be added to each subsequent month accordingly. The interest rate shall be the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal on the Amendment Effective Date, adjusted up or down monthly on the first day of each month thereafter should the Wall Street Journal prime rate fluctuate, plus 50 basis points (i.e., 0.5%). The interest rate will be recalculated on the first day of each month thereafter and is 9.00% as of September 30, 2023. To date, the Company has paid $152.2 million to CTCI with the remaining amount owed as principal of $122.8 million which brings the full amount recognized to $275 million, subject to certain adjustments, such as additive agreed-upon change orders. The Company has accrued interest of $10.9 million as of September 30, 2023, which is included within accrued expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.
 
On April 13, 2023, CTCI served a demand for mediation and arbitration on the Company in connection with outstanding change order claims, and for other compensation it believes it is owed for work on the project. Pursuant to the demand, CTCI is seeking $550 million in total compensation through the end of the project. While the Company is evaluating CTCI’s claims, it denies many of CTCI's change order claims, and the Company intends to vigorously defend its position, including by asserting all rights, defences and counterclaims that the Company may have under the CTCI EPC Agreement and at law. A mediation has not yet been scheduled and an arbitration panel has not yet been selected. Notwithstanding its demand for arbitration and mediation, CTCI has continued working on the project since and during the pendency of the proceedings. On April 28, 2023, the Company entered into a change order whereby the Company has agreed to pay up to a maximum of $15 million to reimburse CTCI for labor costs associated with accelerating the work effort which includes additional personnel, premium and/or overtime differential costs and increasing work shifts. This change order is being paid under the original payment terms of the EPC contract and is not part of the deferred payment. As of November 1
3
, 2023, the Company does not expect that the acceptance of any change orders identified in the Amendment is probable to aggregate to an amount above the New GMP. Amounts, if any, that would be in excess of the New GMP are not reasonably estimable, and as such an amount or range cannot be established.
 
The following table summarizes the minimum required payments of the EPC deferred payments as of September 30, 2023 assuming substantial completion as defined in the CTCI EPC Agreement is achieved in the first quarter of 2024:
 
 
 
EPC deferred payments
 
2023  
 
$
-
 
2024
 
 
68,198,519
 
2025  
 
 
54,558,833
 
Total  
 
$
122,757,352
 
 
Environmental Remediation Liabilities
 
The Company has assumed significant environmental and clean-up liabilities associated with the purchase of the Bakersfield refinery. Accruals for estimated costs from environmental remediation obligations generally are recognized no later than completion of the remedial feasibility study and include, but are not limited to, costs to perform remedial actions and costs of machinery and equipment that are dedicated to the remedial actions and that do not have an alternative use. Such accruals are adjusted as further information develops or circumstances change. We discount environmental remediation liabilities to their present value if payments are fixed and determinable. However, as the timing and amount of these costs were undeterminable as of September 30, 2023, these costs have not been discounted. Expenditures for equipment necessary for environmental issues relating to ongoing operations are capitalized. Changes in laws and regulations and actual remediation expenses compared to historical experience could significantly impact our results of operations and financial position. We believe the estimates selected, in each instance, represent our best estimate of future outcomes, but the actual outcomes could differ from the estimates selected. At September 30, 2023, accrued environmental remediation liability costs totalled $20.0 million of which $3.5 million have been classified as current liabilities. At December 31, 2022, accrued environmental liabilities totalled $20.4 million of which $4.4 million have been classified as current liabilities.

Leases
 
We recognize a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability for each operating and finance lease with a contractual term greater than 12 months at the time of lease inception. We include ROU assets and lease liabilities for leases that exist within other contracts. Leases with an original term of 12 months or less are not recognized on the balance sheet, and the rent expense related to those short-term leases is recognized over the lease term. We do not account for lease and non-lease (e.g. common area maintenance) components of contracts separately for any underlying asset class.
 
We currently lease certain manufacturing equipment, warehouses, office space, and vehicles under operating leases. The table below presents the lease-related assets and liabilities recorded on the balance sheet at September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
 
Leases
 
Classification
 
 
As of
September 30, 2023
 
 
As of
December 31, 2022
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating lease assets
 
Operating lease right-of-use assets
 
 
$
4,007,063
 
 
$
5,332,110
 
Total lease assets
 
 
 
 
$
4,007,063
 
 
$
5,332,110
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
 
Current portion of operating lease obligations
 
 
$
1,952,165
 
 
$
1,897,303
 
Non-current
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
 
Operating lease obligations, net of current portion
 
 
 
1,977,000
 
 
 
3,090,002
 
Total lease liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
$
3,929,165
 
 
$
4,987,305
 
The table below presents the components of lease costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023 and 2022:
 
Leases
 
Classification
 
 
Three months
ended
September 30,
2023
 
 
 
 
Three months
ended
September 30,
2022
 
 
 
 
Nine months
ended
September 30,
2023
 
 
 
 
Nine months
ended
September 30,
2022
 
 
Operating Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating lease cost
 
 
General and administrative expense
 
 
$
436,356
 
 
$
219,407
 
 
$
1,309,068
 
 
$
456,510
 
Finance lease cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of leased assets
 
 
Depreciation expense
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
368,007
 
Interest on lease liabilities
 
 
Interest expense, net
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
93,853
 
Total lease costs
 
 
 
 
 
$
436,356
 
 
$
219,407
 
 
$
1,309,068
 
 
$
918,370
 
 
The table below presents the weighted average remaining lease terms and weighted average discount rates for the Company's leases as of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
 
 
 
As of September 30, 2023
 
 
As of December 31, 2022
 
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating leases
 
 
1.9
 
 
 
2.6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average discount rate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating leases
 
 
4.73
%
 
 
4.61
%
 
The table below presents the maturity of the lease liabilities as of September 30, 2023:
 
 
 
Operating leases
 
2023
 
$
806,828
 
2024
 
 
1,871,371
 
2025
 
 
1,298,420
 
2026
 
 
253,947
 
2027
 
 
32,949
 
Thereafter
 
 
1,432
 
Total lease payments:
 
 
4,264,946
 
Less: present value discount
 
 
(335,781
)
Total lease liabilities
 
$
3,929,165
 
 
Grower Commitments
 
The Company has arrangements with independent growers of our camelina crop, whereby the Company has agreed to pay a fee based on the amount of delivered camelina grain. As of September 30, 2023, the Company estimates that a total of $12.3 million in future payments may be incurred once delivery of the grain is completed over the next six months. Actual amounts to be owed are subject to change based on the actual volumes of on-spec quantities delivered by the growers.
 
The Company has certain bonding requirements with states where it has grower agreements, which requires the Company to cash collateralize a portion of the total bonding requirement. The Company had $4.0 million of cash held as collateral and is classified as
other
long-term
assets
as of September 30, 2023.
 
Legal
 
On February 28, 2023, we received notice from EMOC, that effective as of July 1, 2023, EMOC was irrevocably terminating the POA without any further action of EMOC, upon failure of the Bakersfield Renewable Fuels Refinery to commence operations contemplated by the Offtake Agreement by June 30, 2023. The Company believes that ExxonMobil’s purported termination of the Offtake Agreement was ineffective, and the Company reserves and will enforce all its rights under the Offtake Agreement, including without limitation those rights that automatically extend the Start Date. On May 15, 2023, the Company further advised EMOC that force majeure had occurred at the Bakersfield Renewable Fuels Refinery, as a result of which the Start Date under the POA was automatically extended pursuant to the terms of the POA until November 30, 2023, at the earliest. The Company also advised EMOC that if it did not withdraw its prior putative “irrevocable” termination of the POA, the Company would seek to initiate arbitration proceedings to recover for damages incurred by the Company as a result of EMOC’s wrongful termination. On May 19, 2023, EMOC notified the Company that it was terminating the POA effective as of that date as a result of EMOC’s views that the force majeure events described in the Company’s May 15, 2023 letter had existed for 365 consecutive days or more - a contention that the Company vigorously denies. On May 21, 2023, the Company notified EMOC that it rejects its latest putative attempt to terminate the POA, disagrees with EMOC’s interpretation of the POA, and believes that its force majeure claims are valid and enforceable under the POA.
 
On March 1, 2023, we received notice that ExxonMobil, in its capacity as a holder of Series C Preferred stock, filed a complaint against the Company in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”) to compel inspection of the Company’s books and records under Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“Section 220”) in relation to alleged wrongdoing by our management. On April 28, 2023, the Company and ExxonMobil jointly filed a stipulation in the Court pursuant to which the parties agreed on the scope of a voluntary document production by the Company for purposes of resolving the books and records complaint under Section 220 (the “Stipulation to Resolve”). Pursuant to the Stipulation to Resolve, the parties agreed to hold the Company’s deadline to respond to ExxonMobil’s initial complaint in abeyance while the Company completed its voluntary document production for the agreed purpose of resolving the action. Upon completion of the Company’s voluntary document production, on June 28, 2023 the Company and ExxonMobil jointly filed a status report in the Court requesting that the action be stayed until September 11, 2023. At the joint requests of the parties, the Court has extended the stay through November 15, 2023. It is possible that one or more additional stockholder suits could be filed pertaining to the subject matter of the Section 220 complaint. While the Company intends to comply with applicable law, it denies the allegations described in the complaint. Moreover, the Stipulation to Resolve is not an admission of liability by the Company, and is subject and without prejudice to the Company’s express reservation of rights in all regards.
 
BKRF, formerly Alon Bakersfield Property, Inc., is one of the parties to an action pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. In June 2019, the jury awarded the plaintiffs approximately $6.7 million against Alon Bakersfield Property, Inc. and Paramount Petroleum Corporation (a parent company of Alon Bakersfield Property, Inc. at the time of the award in 2019). Under the agreements pursuant to which we purchased BKRF, Alon Paramount agreed to assume and be liable for (and to indemnify, defend, and hold BKRF harmless from) this litigation. In addition, Paramount Petroleum Corporation has posted a bond to cover this judgment amount. All legal fees in this matter are being paid by Alon Paramount. As Paramount Petroleum Corporation and the Company are jointly and severally liable for the judgment, and Paramount Petroleum Corporation has agreed to absorb all of the liability and has posted a bond to cover the judgment amount, no loss has been accrued by the Company with respect to this matter. In August 2021, the Ninth Circuit partially remanded the case to the district court to ascertain whether it possesses jurisdiction over the Company. If the district court determines that it lacks jurisdiction, then the claims against the Company will be dismissed. In April 2023, the Ninth Circuit held that the trial judge erred in allowing the plaintiffs to seek retroactive trespass damages prior to the date the plaintiffs purchased the land at issue in 2014, and remanded the case for further proceedings.
 
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may face various claims brought by third parties, including former workers and employees, and the Company may, from time to time, make claims or take legal actions to assert the Company’s rights, including intellectual property rights, contractual disputes and other commercial disputes. Any of these claims could subject the Company to litigation. Management believes the outcomes of currently pending claims will not likely have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.