Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

v3.24.1.u1
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
NOTE K - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
USDA Grant

In May 2023, the Company was awarded a five-year, $30.0 million grant by U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and the Natural Resources Conservation Service(“NRCS”) to build markets for climate-smart commodities and invest in America’s climate-smart producers. The objectives of the project are to support the production and marketing of climate-smart commodities by providing voluntary incentives to producers and landowners to implement climate-smart agricultural production practices, activities, and systems on working lands; measure/quantify, monitor and verify the carbon and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) benefits associated with those practices; and develop markets and promote the resulting climate-smart commodities (i.e. Camelina and Camelina seeds). The goal of the project is to improve agronomic practices and drive the adoption of carbon-smart practices that will ultimately lower GHG emissions and carbon intensity of Camelina production as well as increase carbon sequestration in the soil with a benefit to the crops in rotation with Camelina.

Total reimbursements from the USDA grant (including amounts due to be received) were $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, and are reported net of general and administrative expenses and facilities expenses, respectively in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company has $0.2 million of receivables due from the USDA grant program, which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2023.

The Company has quarterly reporting requirements that include performance and progress reporting, in addition to being subject to an annual audit for costs reimbursed under the USDA grant. The Company is the primary contractor for the grant award and includes subcontractors and sub-awardees.
Feedstock Supply Agreement
We had an exclusive feedstock supply agreement for the purchase of certain grades of soybean oil, under which the supplier had agreed to supply a maximum volume of 1.2 billion pounds of soybean oil over a period of twenty-four months, with such maximum volume being equally allotted between four 6-month segments or periods. A condition to the sale and purchase of the feedstock was the completion and commissioning of the Facility, and until such condition had been satisfied the Company had no obligation to purchase such feedstock under the supply agreement. See Note M - Subsequent Events for further information.

Engineering, Procurement and Construction Contract
On May 18, 2021, our BKRF subsidiary and CTCI entered into an Engineering, Procurement and Construction Agreement with CTCI (the “CTCI EPC Agreement”) pursuant to which the firm agreed to produce services for the engineering, procurement, construction, start-up and testing of the Facility.
On January 10, 2023, BKRF entered into Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) to the CTCI EPC Agreement. Pursuant to the Amendment, BKRF and CTCI agreed to, among other things:
(i) a guaranteed minimum price of $275.0 million (subject to upward adjustment pending final settlement of certain change orders pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Amendment) (the “New GMP”), subsequently revised on December 18, 2023 to a new guaranteed minimum price of $360.0 million as further discussed below;
(ii) a change to the payment dates for costs and fees that are payable to CTCI under the CTCI EPC Agreement, which will now be payable after Substantial Completion of our Facility (the “Project”) in 18 monthly installments, which was also revised with the interim settlement agreement reached on December 18, 2023 as further described below; and
(iii) provide for liquidated damages commencing on a Substantial Completion date of March 31, 2023, which may only be adjusted in accordance with the CTCI EPC Agreement. In connection with the Amendment, the Company
agreed to provide a payment guarantee in favor of CTCI for amounts that may be owed by BKRF under the CTCI EPC Agreement, pursuant to an owner parent guarantee, dated as of January 10, 2023, by and between the Company and CTCI.
(iv) Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. entered into a guarantee agreement for the amounts owed under the CTCI EPC Agreement in the event of default by BKRF.
On April 13, 2023, CTCI served demand for mediation and arbitration on the Company in connection with outstanding change order claims, and for other compensation it believes it is owed for work on the project. Pursuant to the demand, CTCI is seeking $550.0 million in total compensation through the end of the project. While the Company is evaluating CTCI’s claims, it denies many of CTCI's change order claims, and the Company intends to vigorously defend its position, including by asserting all rights, defenses and counterclaims that the Company may have under the CTCI EPC Agreement and at law. A mediation has not yet been scheduled and an arbitration panel has not yet been selected. Notwithstanding its demand for arbitration and mediation, CTCI has continued working on the project since and during the pendency of the proceedings.
On April 28, 2023, the Company entered into a change order whereby the Company has agreed to pay up to a maximum of $15.0 million to reimburse CTCI for labor costs associated with accelerating the work effort which includes additional personnel, premium and/or overtime differential costs and increasing work shifts. This change order is being paid under the original payment terms of the EPC contract and is not part of the deferred payment.
On December 18, 2023, the Company entered into an interim settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with CTCI. The Settlement Agreement provides that all payments to CTCI for in-scope work performed under the CTCI EPC Agreement will be payable after Substantial Completion of the Company’s Facility (the “Project”), in 30 monthly installments (provided that the parties may agree to extend such term for a period of up to 10 years). The Company has assessed the scope of work associated with achieving the milestone of Substantial Completion, as defined by the CTCI EPC Agreement, and believes that it will not be met until at least the first quarter of 2025, while the Company expects that the production of commercial volumes and revenue generation associated with the commencement of operations to occur during the second quarter of 2024. The payment terms for out-of-scope work performed after October 30, 2023 will remain unchanged. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, CTCI has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to achieve Mechanical and Substantial Completion of the Project by the earliest date practicable and provided BKRF with representations regarding completion of certain Project milestones. In consideration for these agreements and undertakings, BKRF agreed to a new guaranteed minimum price of $360.0 million, plus accrued interest. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company has paid $150.9 million and $146.3 million, respectively, to CTCI with the remaining amount owed as principal of $209.1 million, as of December 31, 2023, which brings the full amount of principal to $360.0 million and is subject to certain adjustments, such as additive change orders. Deferred payments accrue interest equal to the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal, adjusted up or down monthly on the first day of each month thereafter should the Wall Street Journal prime rate fluctuate, plus 50 basis points (i.e., 0.5%). The interest rate will be recalculated on the first day of each month thereafter and was 9.0% and 7.5% as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 totaled $17.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively, and is capitalized as a component of property, plant and equipment. Accrued interest included within the EPC deferred payment (excluding contingent amounts) is $20.5 million and $2.6 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
As of April 16, 2024, CTCI continues to assert it has certain claims related to its costs and is seeking at least $760.0 million in total compensation from the Company through the end of the project. While the Company is evaluating CTCI’s claims, we dispute such claims, and the Company intends to vigorously defend its position, including by asserting all rights, defenses and counterclaims that the Company may have under the CTCI EPC Agreement, as amended and at law. We accrue for contingent obligations, if any, when it is probable that a liability is incurred and the amount or range of amounts is reasonably estimable. Accordingly, the Company has accrued $372.6 million for CTCI’s claims in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2023 which includes contingent accrued interest of $8.9 million. Therefore, as of December 31, 2023, the amount of the EPC deferred payment totaled $602.2 million which includes the contingent liability of $372.6 million. As new facts become known, the assumptions related to a contingency are reviewed and adjustments are made, as necessary. Any legal costs incurred related to contingencies are expensed as incurred.
The following table summarizes the minimum required payments of the EPC deferred payments as of December 31, 2023 assuming Substantial Completion as defined in the CTCI EPC Agreement is achieved in the first quarter of 2025 and
excludes the contingent amounts accrued totaling $372.6 million as there is no contractual obligation related to this amount:
(in thousands) EPC deferred payments
2024 $ — 
2025 91,871 
2026 91,871 
2027 45,936 
Total $ 229,679 
Environmental Remediation Liabilities
The Company has assumed significant environmental and clean-up liabilities associated with the purchase of the Bakersfield Facility.
Accruals for estimated costs from environmental remediation obligations generally are recognized no later than completion of the remedial feasibility study and include, but are not limited to, costs to perform remedial actions and costs of machinery and equipment that are dedicated to the remedial actions and that do not have an alternative use. Such accruals are adjusted as further information develops or circumstances change. We discount environmental remediation liabilities to their present value if payments are fixed and determinable. However, as the timing and amount of these costs were undeterminable as of December 31, 2023, these costs have not been discounted. Expenditures for equipment necessary for environmental issues relating to ongoing operations are capitalized. Changes in laws and regulations and actual remediation expenses compared to historical experience could significantly impact our results of operations and financial position. We believe the estimates selected, in each instance, represent our best estimate of future outcomes, but the actual outcomes could differ from the estimates selected. At December 31, 2023, accrued environmental remediation liability costs totaled $19.8 million of which $3.7 million have been classified as current liabilities. At December 31, 2022, accrued environmental liabilities totaled $20.4 million of which $4.4 million have been classified as current liabilities.
Leases
We recognize a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability for each operating and finance lease with a contractual term greater than 12 months at the time of lease inception. We include ROU assets and lease liabilities for leases that exist within other contracts. Leases with an original term of 12 months or less are not recognized on the balance sheet, and the rent expense related to those short-term leases is recognized over the lease term. We do not account for lease and non-lease (e.g. common area maintenance) components of contracts separately for any underlying asset class.
We currently lease certain manufacturing equipment, warehouses, office space, and vehicles under operating leases. Lease commencement occurs on the date we take possession or control of the property or equipment. Original terms for our real estate-related leases are generally between three and five years. Original terms for equipment-related leases, primarily manufacturing equipment and vehicles, are generally between one and ten years. Some of our leases also include rental escalation clauses. Renewal options are included in the determination of lease payments when management determines the options are reasonably certain of exercise, considering financial performance, strategic importance and/or invested capital.
If readily determinable, the rate implicit in the lease is used to discount lease payments to present value; however, substantially all of our leases do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate. When the implicit rate is not determinable, our estimated incremental borrowing rate is utilized, determined on a collateralized basis, to discount lease payments based on information available at lease commencement.
Total lease costs recorded include fixed operating lease costs and variable lease costs. Most of our real estate leases require payment of certain expenses, such as common area maintenance costs, of which the fixed portion is included in operating lease costs. We recognize operating lease costs on a straight-line basis over the lease term. In addition to the above costs, variable lease costs are recognized when probable and are not included in determining the present value of our lease liability.
The ROU asset is measured at the initial amount of the lease liability (calculated as the present value of lease payments over the term of the lease) adjusted for lease payments made at or before the lease commencement date and initial direct costs. For operating leases, ROU assets are reduced over the lease term by the recognized straight-line lease expense less the amount of accretion of the lease liability determined using the effective interest method. For finance leases, ROU assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the useful life of the leased asset or the lease term. Interest expense on each finance lease liability is recognized utilizing the effective interest method. ROU assets are tested for impairment in the same manner as long-lived assets and we determined there have been no triggering events for impairment. Additionally, we monitor for events or changes in circumstances that may require a reassessment of one of our leases and determine if a remeasurement is required.
The table below presents the lease-related assets and liabilities recorded on the balance sheet at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
(in thousands)
Leases Classification As of December 31, 2023 As of December 31, 2022
Assets
Operating lease assets Operating lease right-of-use assets $ 3,158  $ 5,332 
Total lease assets   $ 3,158  $ 5,332 
 
Liabilities
Current
Operating Current portion of operating lease obligations $ 1,806  $ 1,897 
Non-current
Operating Operating lease obligations, net of current portion 1,154  3,090 
Total lease liabilities $ 2,960  $ 4,987 
The table below presents the components of lease costs for the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
(in thousands)
Leases Classification Year ended
December 31, 2023
Year ended
December 31, 2022
Operating Expenses
Operating lease cost General and administrative expense $ 1,912  $ 875 
Short-term and variable lease cost
General and administrative expenses
181  39 
Finance lease cost
Amortization of leased assets Depreciation expense —  368 
Interest on lease liabilities Interest expense, net —  94 
Total lease costs   $ 2,093  $ 1,376 
The table below presents the weighted average remaining lease terms and weighted average discount rates for the Company's leases as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
  As of
December 31, 2023
As of
December 31, 2022
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)
Operating leases 1.8 2.6
Weighted average discount rate
Operating leases 5.32  % 4.61  %
The table below presents the maturity of the lease liabilities as of December 31, 2023:
(in thousands) Operating leases
2024 $ 1,713 
2025 1,130 
2026 253 
2027 33 
2028
Thereafter — 
Total lease payments: 3,130 
Less: present value discount (170)
Total lease liabilities $ 2,960 

Grower Commitments
The Company has arrangements with independent growers of our Camelina crop, whereby the Company has agreed to pay a fee based on the amount of delivered Camelina grain. As of December 31, 2023, the Company estimates that a total of $11.4 million in future payments may be incurred once the Company calls for the delivery of the grain and the grain is delivered by the grower, which, if called, is expected to occur over the next seven months subsequent to December 31, 2023. Actual amounts to be owed are subject to change based on the actual volumes of on-spec quantities delivered by the growers.
The Company has certain bonding requirements with states where it has grower agreements, which requires the Company to cash collateralize a portion of the total bonding requirement. The Company had $4.0 million of cash held as collateral and is classified as other long-term assets as of December 31, 2023.
Legal
On February 28, 2023, we received notice from EMOC, that effective as of July 1, 2023, EMOC was irrevocably terminating the POA without any further action of EMOC, upon failure of the Facility to commence operations contemplated by the Offtake Agreement by June 30, 2023. The Company believes that ExxonMobil’s purported termination of the Offtake Agreement was ineffective, and the Company reserves and will enforce all its rights under the Offtake Agreement, including without limitation those rights that automatically extend the Start Date. On May 15, 2023, the Company further advised EMOC that force majeure had occurred at the Facility, as a result of which the Start Date under the POA was automatically extended pursuant to the terms of the POA until November 30, 2023, at the earliest. The Company also advised EMOC that if it did not withdraw its prior putative “irrevocable” termination of the POA, the Company would seek to initiate arbitration proceedings to recover for damages incurred by the Company as a result of EMOC’s wrongful termination. On May 19, 2023, EMOC notified the Company that it was terminating the POA effective as of that date as a result of EMOC’s views that the force majeure events described in the Company’s May 15, 2023 letter had existed for 365 consecutive days or more - a contention that the Company vigorously denies. On May 21, 2023, the Company notified EMOC that it rejects its latest putative attempt to terminate the POA, disagrees with EMOC’s interpretation of the POA, and believes that its force majeure claims are valid and enforceable under the POA.
On March 1, 2023, we received notice that ExxonMobil, in its capacity as a holder of Series C Preferred stock, filed a complaint against the Company in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”) to compel inspection of the Company’s books and records under Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“Section 220”) in relation to alleged wrongdoing by our management. On April 28, 2023, the Company and ExxonMobil jointly filed a stipulation in the Court pursuant to which the parties agreed on the scope of a voluntary document production by the Company for purposes of resolving the books and records complaint under Section 220 (the “Stipulation to Resolve”). Pursuant to the Stipulation to Resolve, the parties agreed to hold the Company’s deadline to respond to ExxonMobil’s initial complaint in abeyance while the Company completed its voluntary document production for the agreed purpose of resolving the action. Upon completion of the Company’s voluntary document production, on June 28, 2023 the Company and ExxonMobil jointly filed a status report in the Court requesting that the action be stayed until September 11, 2023. At the joint requests of the parties, the Court has extended the stay through January 15, 2024. On December 4, 2023, the Company and ExxonMobil jointly filed a stipulation pursuant to Rule 510(f) of the Delaware Rules of Evidence. In accordance with this stipulation, the parties agreed on the scope of an additional voluntary document production by the Company for the purposes of resolving the complaint, under Rule 510(g) of the Delaware Rules of Evidence. On January 29, 2024, the Company and the Plaintiff jointly filed a stipulation in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware pursuant to which the parties informed the Court that they would be requesting a hearing date to decide matters outstanding from the Company’s voluntary document production made in accordance with the parties’ agreement under Rule 510(g) of the Delaware Rules of Evidence. Such hearing is expected to be held in April 2024. It is possible that one or more additional stockholder suits could be filed pertaining to the subject matter of the Section 220 complaint. While the Company intends to comply with applicable law, it denies the allegations described in the complaint. Moreover, the Stipulation to Resolve is not an admission of liability by the Company, and is subject and without prejudice to the Company’s express reservation of rights in all regards.
BKRF, formerly Alon Bakersfield Property, Inc., is one of the parties to an action pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. In June 2019, the jury awarded the plaintiffs approximately $6.7 million against Alon Bakersfield Property, Inc. and Paramount Petroleum Corporation (a parent company of Alon Bakersfield Property, Inc. at the time of the award in 2019). Under the agreements pursuant to which we purchased BKRF, Alon Paramount agreed to assume and be liable for (and to indemnify, defend, and hold BKRF harmless from) this litigation. In addition, Paramount Petroleum Corporation has posted a bond to cover this judgment amount. All legal fees in this matter are being paid by Alon Paramount. As Paramount Petroleum Corporation and the Company are jointly and severally liable for the judgment, and Paramount Petroleum Corporation has agreed to absorb all of the liability and has posted a bond to cover the judgment amount, no loss has been accrued by the Company with respect to this matter. In August 2021, the Ninth Circuit partially remanded the case to the district court to ascertain whether it possesses jurisdiction over the Company. If the district court determines that it lacks jurisdiction, then the claims against the Company will be dismissed. In April 2023, the Ninth
Circuit held that the trial judge erred in allowing the plaintiffs to seek retroactive trespass damages prior to the date the plaintiffs purchased the land at issue in 2014, and remanded the case for further proceedings.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may face various claims brought by third parties, including former workers and employees, and the Company may, from time to time, make claims or take legal actions to assert the Company’s rights, including intellectual property rights, contractual disputes and other commercial disputes. Any of these claims could subject the Company to litigation. Management believes the outcomes of currently pending claims will not likely have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Professional Services Agreement
On May 22, 2023, the Company entered into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) with a service provider for project management and other project related services, including supporting the commissioning and start-up activities of our Facility on a time and materials basis. The terms of the PSA provide for two-thirds of the total invoice to be paid in cash with the remaining one-third to be paid, at the service provider's option, 90 days after Facility achieves Substantial Completion, as defined by the CTCI EPC Agreement, or credited to the next tranche of debt to the Senior Credit Agreement, as applicable (the “Future Component”). As of December 31, 2023, the Company has accrued $5.3 million in connection with the Future Component and is included in Other Long-Term Liabilities as Substantial Completion is currently not expected to occur until the first quarter of 2025. The Company also had $0.7 million of unpaid invoices in accounts payables due this service provider as of December 31, 2023.
Indemnities and Guarantees
In addition to the indemnification provisions contained in the Company’s organization documents, the Company generally enters into separate indemnification agreements with the Company’s directors and officers. These agreements require the Company, among other things, to indemnify the director or officer against specified expenses and liabilities, such as attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlements, paid by the individual in connection with any action, suit or proceeding arising out of the individual’s status or service as the Company’s directors or officers, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct or conduct that is knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest, and to advance expenses incurred by the individual in connection with any proceeding against the individual with respect to which the individual may be entitled to indemnification by the Company. The Company also indemnifies its lessor in connection with its facility lease for certain claims arising from the use of the facility. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.